Call for Tools
The 4th International Conference on Technical Debt will be held virtually (originally in Madrid, Spain), on May 19-21, 2021, collocated with ICSE 2021.
Technical debt is a metaphor that software developers and managers increasingly use to communicate key trade-offs between time to market and quality issues.
While other software engineering disciplines—such as software maintenance and evolution, refactoring, software quality, and empirical software engineering—have produced results relevant to managing technical debt, none of them alone suffice to model, manage, and communicate the different facets of the design trade-off problems involved in managing technical debt. Similarly, while many software engineering practices can be used to get ahead of technical debt, organizations struggle with managing technical debt routinely and strategically.
Tools play a critical role in understanding the management, monitoring, and measurement of technical debt in real-world situations. We invite researchers, practitioners and organizations to showcase new techniques, methods, and tools that can aid practitioners and decision makers in these critical tasks to participate in TechDebt 2021.
Tools track accepts two types of submissions:
- Tool presentation papers (up to 5 pages): describe innovative and original tools addressing technical debt issues or aiming at the management of technical debt. Submitted tool papers will be peer-reviewed and accepted submissions will be published in the conference proceedings.
- Extended abstract (1-2 pages): describe innovative and original initial tools idea for which there is not yet a prototype in order to obtain early feedback. Extended abstracts provide practitioners with an opportunity to showcase a tool-specific perspective. Extended abstracts are not peer reviewed and will not be published in the conference proceedings.
Suggested content for both types of submissions, the program committee and chairs will look for:
- The alignment to the overarching technical debt theme of the conference.
- How the purpose of the tool is addressed and how validation experiences with practitioners have been planned or conducted (if applicable)
In EasyChair, on top of specifying the type of submission, indicate how you will participate in the conference session (you may select one or both):
- Panel participant: In the panel discussion we will engage participants and the audience on how the showcased tools help address technical debt challenges.
- Tool demonstration: If you propose to showcase your tool or product from your organization, please let us know your requirements *(such as space, equipment, …). A dedicated demo session will be part of the Tools track.
All accepted papers will also have the possibility to bring a poster during the conference.
Papers and extended abstract must be submitted electronically via the TechDebtConf2021 EasyChair site. Submissions must be in PDF and conform to the ACM formatting guidelines applied for ICSE 2021. Submissions may not exceed the number of pages specified above (including all text, references and figures). Purchases of additional pages in the proceedings are not allowed.
Formatting instructions are available at https://www.acm.org/publications/proceedings-template for both LaTeX and Word users.
The official publication date is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM or IEEE Digital Libraries. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of ICSE 2021. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work.
Accepted papers must be presented in person at the conference by one of the authors. Accepted submissions will be published as part of the ICSE co-located events proceedings.
January 27January 31, 2021: Tool presentation papers (up to 5 pages) (extended)
- February 24, 2021: Notification of acceptance or rejection
- March 22, 2021: Camera-ready papers
- March 30, 2021: Extended abstracts (up to 2 pages)
- April 10, 2021: Notification of acceptance or rejection for Extended abstracts
- May 23–24, 2021: TechDebt Conference
This program is tentative and subject to change.
Wed 19 May
16:00 - 16:50
17:00 - 17:50
|Frequency and Impact of Technical Debt Characteristics in Companies Producing Mechatronic Products|
Fandi BiTechnical University of Munich, Birgit Vogel-HeuserKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Litong XuPre-print Media Attached File Attached
|Impact of Opportunistic Reuse Practices to Technical Debt|
Rafael CapillaUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos, Tommi MikkonenUniversity of Helsinki, Carlos CarrilloTechnical University of Madrid, Francesca Arcelli FontanaUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Ilaria PigazziniUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Valentina LenarduzziLUT UniversityFile Attached
|Security Debt: Characteristics, Product Life-Cycle Integrations and Items|
Jabier MartinezTecnalia, Nuria QuintanoTecnalia, Alejandra RuizTecnalia, Izaskun SantamariaTecnalia, Iker Martinez de SoriaTecnalia, José AriasTecnaliaPre-print
18:00 - 19:00
|Business-Driven Technical Debt Prioritization: An Industrial Case Study|
Rodrigo Rebouças de AlmeidaFederal University of Paraiba, Rafael do Nascimento RibeiroUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, Christoph TreudeUniversity of Adelaide, Uirá KuleszaFederal University of Rio Grande do NortePre-print
|Preventing Technical Debt by Technical Debt Aware Project Management - Evaluation of a Framework for Managing Technical Debt Developed by Practitioners|
Marion WieseUniversität Hamburg, MIN Fakultät, FB Informatik, Matthias RiebischUniversität Hamburg, MIN Fakultät, FB Informatik, Julian SchwarzeGruner + Jahr GmbHPre-print
|Architectural Archipelagos: Technical Debt in Long-Lived Software Research Platforms|
Thu 20 May
16:00 - 16:50
17:00 - 17:40
|Experiences on Managing Technical Debt with Code Smells and AntiPatterns|
Jacinto Ramirez LahtiSolita Ltd, Finland, Antti-Pekka TuovinenUniversity of Helsinki, Tommi MikkonenUniversity of HelsinkiPre-print
|Worst Smells and Their Worst Reasons|
17:40 - 18:20
18:20 - 19:00
|Predicting Relative Thresholds for Object Oriented Metrics|
Sultan AlhusainSaudi Electronic UniversityPre-print File Attached
|Characterizing Technical Debt and Antipatterns in AI-Based Systems: A Systematic Literature Review|
Justus BognerUniversity of Stuttgart, Institute of Software Engineering, Empirical Software Engineering Group, Roberto VerdecchiaVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Ilias GerostathopoulosVrije Universiteit AmsterdamPre-print
Fri 21 May
17:00 - 17:50
|Carrot and Stick approaches revisited when managing Technical Debt in an educational/training context|
|The Need for Holistic Technical Debt Management across the Value Stream: Lessons Learnt and Open Challenges|
|Assessing Smart Contracts Security Technical Debts|
Sabreen AhmadjeeUniversity of Birmingham, Carlos Mera-GómezESPOL Polythecnic University, Rami BahsoonSchool of Computer Science, University of BirminghamPre-print